There are many people,
particularly Evangelical Christians, who are actively campaigning for
the 1973 Roe v Wade judgement, that made abortion - under certain conditions -
legal in the United States, to be overturned. The question then arises as to what
the effect would be if such an event were to happen and abortion became far
more difficult to obtain than it is at present.
It seems to me that one has to look at this matter in the
round and not be swayed by any prejudices one might have regarding abortion,
based on religious beliefs or anything else.
There are many examples across the world that point to the
likely outcome. These relate to the practice of women who desperately seek
abortions taking all means they can to achieve that. The fact that abortion
becomes illegal does not mean that abortions will not take place.
One recourse is to leave the country and seek an abortion in
a country where the rules are far more relaxed. Some years ago abortion was far
more easily obtained in Poland than in Sweden. There was a steady flow of
Swedish women travelling to Polish abortion clinics. Then two things happened -
Poland tightened its laws and Sweden relaxed theirs. The flow then reversed,
with Polish women travelling to Sweden.
But suppose a woman cannot afford to make such a trip? The
temptation then is to get a "back street" or "do it
yourself" abortion. Many women have died as a result of undergoing an
unsafe abortion, and the vast majority of these cases occur in countries where
abortion is severely restricted in law.
The United States has a particular problem in this regard,
due to the huge cost entailed in undergoing a live birth. One might say to a
young woman that she should go to full term and have the child adopted - but
suppose she cannot afford the huge fees that hospitals charge for births and
maternity care, these running to tens of thousands of dollars? This prospect
can only add to the sense of desperation that a woman of limited means, without
health insurance, is likely to feel. She might well come to the conclusion that
paying far less to an illegal abortionist is worth the risk.
This is not an easy moral dilemma, and I will confess to
having changed my mind on the general question of abortion. I am well aware
that - had abortion been freely available in Scotland in 1951/2 - I would quite
likely never have been born. A young wife was made pregnant by someone other
than her husband, who had no intention of bringing up another man's child. At
that time, the adoption route was the only one available, so I was duly
adopted.
So why am I not a "right to life" advocate"?
It is because I am fully aware that it is always unsafe to generalise from a
particular case, and I am also conscious of the big picture - which shows the
misery and death that result when abortion services are severely restricted.
© John Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment