The distance
between the Earth and the Moon is not constant, but varies over the course of
the Moon’s orbit around the Earth, which is not a perfect circle but an ellipse.
The point at which the Moon is furthest from Earth is called the apogee, and
the nearest point is called the perigee. These points do not coincide with the
phases of the Moon (i.e. when there is a full moon, or crescent moon, etc), and
they vary from year to year.
The average
distance, from the centre of the Earth to the centre of the Moon, is 384,403km
(238,329 miles), with the distance at perigee being 363,104km (225,124 miles)
and at apogee 405,696km (251,531 miles). As a basic rule of thumb, to say that
the moon is a quarter of a million miles away is a good enough estimate for
most purposes (e.g. pub quizzes!).
The
calculation of the distance was made considerably easier, and to a greater
degree of accuracy, when the Apollo astronauts left reflective plates on the
Moon’s surface in the early 1970s. Three reflectors were left at various sites.
Daily checks are now made by sending laser signals from Earth observatories and
measuring the time taken for the signals to hit the reflectors and be received
back on Earth. The returned pulses are extremely weak, and there are only three
observatories that are equipped to detect these signals and convert them into
accurate calculations of the Earth-Moon distance. There could therefore be
inaccuracies caused by such things as slight fluctuations in the Earth’s shape
that are not being picked up by the current arrangements.
Scientists
are hoping that a new manned mission to the Moon will be able to replace the
reflectors with transponders that will not just reflect the laser beams but
send pulses of their own. This is because the reflectors may well have suffered
damage from tiny meteorites in the 30+ years they have been there, meaning that
the bounced signals are much weaker than they once were. Stronger pulses could
be picked up and interpreted by many more Earth observatories, and more accurate
results be obtained.
However, even
given these problems with the current methods, we know that the Earth-Moon
distance is increasing by about 3.8cm (1.5 inches) a year. This is caused by
gravity interactions between the Earth and the Moon, such that the Earth is
pushing the Moon away from it at every revolution. By extrapolating backwards
in time, we can therefore work out that the Moon must have much closer in the
distant past, and indeed that the two bodies are in reality a double planet.
This means
that, a billion years ago, the Moon would have been 10% closer to Earth than it
is now. However, other evidence, based on geology, suggests that the Moon’s
recession has speeded up, and that it was probably only receding at 2.0cm a
year at that time.
Looking the
other way, we can calculate that at some future time the Moon will have drifted
so far out, and slowed down to such an extent, that it will not appear to orbit
the Earth at all and will simply hang in the sky over one point and not be
visible at all from much of the planet. However, that is so far into the future
that there will be no-one around to witness this!
One
remarkable thing about the current Earth-Moon distance is that the orb of the
Moon in the sky appears to be almost exactly the same size as that of the Sun,
which is of course many times larger than the Moon but at a considerably
greater distance away. Therefore, when we see a solar eclipse, caused by the
Moon coming between the Earth and the Sun, not only is the light of the Sun
blocked off for the short time of the full eclipse, but we are able to witness
the full glory of the solar corona (using all the correct viewing precautions,
of course). In the very remote past, when there would have been no humans to
witness it, a solar eclipse would have meant complete darkness for much longer,
and no view of the corona, as the Moon’s disc would have been larger than that
of the Sun.
© John Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment